Wednesday, April 25, 2007

Catholic Church Admits to Centuries of Fraud and Deception (Sort of)

This link is to a story that ran a while back as a news item at SermonAudio.com.

The story is that there's this young girl, who partook of her first Mass as a good Catholic youth. Only, she's got this digestive problem which makes it impossible for her to digest wheat. Apparently, the local priest accomodated her by using a barley wafer, rather than the normal wheat-based version; and now higher-ups in the Catholic Church have "invalidated" her communion. You see, the wafer must be made in a precise, traditional way, or the whole deal is off.

This item garnered about five dozen comments. As always at SermonAudio, the comments were mostly juvenile, or else just outrageously stupid. This point was completely missed:

The story represents an admission by all parties that the Catholic Church is a big lie.

Hold on. Don't freak out: I'll explain how.

Even Catholic defenders and apologists have pointed out the truth that the Roman Catholic Church stands or falls with the Mass. If the Mass is what they say it is, then this necessarily validates Rome as the one, true Church on earth. If the Mass is not what they say it is, then everything else about her is also indefensible and false.

And let's be clear: what they say it is, is this. They say that during the Mass, the elements of bread and wine actually, physically, are transformed into the literal, physical flesh and blood of the man Jesus Christ. As documented in Foxe's Book of Martyrs, multitudes of Christians lost their lives in the Reformation period for refusing to confess that the bread actually becomes the Body. They said the bread remains bread, and this condemned them to death.

Now, in the news story in question, both parties (the girl's family and the Roman Church officials) have unwittingly admitted that there is no transformation of the substance of the bread. All sides have tacitly agreed that the bread remains merely bread.

If the wafer becomes flesh, then why worry what the wafer was baked out of?

During the Mass, the tiny cake of wheat ceases to be wheat and becomes human flesh, right?

So why would the family worry that the Mass would harm their daughter due to her inability to digest wheat?

Why would the first priest agree with that and have a wafer made of barley?

Why would the Church that has invalidated her First Communion not say, "Hey, just have faith and go ahead and partake. By the time she eats it, it's not wheat anymore anyway?"

(Which they are not saying, by the way. If she does eat, and then die, well then you can add that Wrongful Death lawsuit to the hundreds of sexual misconduct suits. Got to CYA.)

By admitting that the Mass would harm the girl's systems, they've all admitted that the bread remains bread. Thus, they've inadvertently admitted what we've all known all along: the Mass is a fiction. And thus, so is the Church that administers it.

6 comments:

Joshua A. Hitchcock said...

yep. I knew it all along.

Highland Host said...

And of course hundreds have died for affirming exactly what has been affirmed in this case. The bread is bread and remains so.

Will we now hear an apology for the fires of Smithfield? I doubt it!!!

Gordan said...

More likely, they'll apologize next for not being "nice" to gays. (I mean, other than employing crowds of them in their priesthood.)

Donato said...

The Church teaches transubstantiation, that the accidents remain while the substance changes. While the girl is receiving the Body of Christ, she is also receiving the visible accidents of wheat, which is what would make her sick.

Gordan said...

B careful, when defending one's church, not to fall under the horror of one her mighty imprecations:

"CANON lI.-If any one saith, that, in the sacred and holy sacrament of the Eucharist, the substance of the bread and wine remains conjointly with the body and blood of our Lord Jesus Christ, and denieth that wonderful and singular conversion of the whole substance of the bread into the Body, and of the whole substance of the wine into the Blood-the species Only of the bread and wine remaining-which conversion indeed the Catholic Church most aptly calls Transubstantiation; let him be anathema." (from the Council of Trent, on the Most Holy Eucharist)

Note that phrase about the "wonderful and singular conversion of the whole substance of the bread into the Body."

BCatholic, you want to say the bread remains bread. I completely agree, which is why I (and maybe you) would've burned at the stake in the 16th Century along with the Protestant multitude who confessed the same thing...a thing which Trent anathematizes.

You may retort that I'm misunderstanding what is meant by the "whole substance of the bread," but then we're back to the fact that you need an infallible interpreter to interpret your infallible interpreter.

Testimonials said...

I want to recommend JAJA7DEMON, to all those out there who might be seeking solution to having their GAY LOVER BACK to quickly contact JAJA7DEMON@GMAIL.COM, for a perfect solution to their GAY problems. Am a living witness too because he brought my GAY LOVER BACK to me within two days